Search results

Hmm ya im not sure how they got the height. But i do see where you are pulling the figures from. This sheet says our height is 60.4" and we weigh 2,966: http://www.srtforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=384802 This sheet says our height is 59.7" and we weigh 3,189...

Not exactly sure where you're getting its 3 inches taller. The base Caliber SXT comes in at 59.8" to the MS3s 57.7". The SRT will be about 1.5-2 inches shorter then the SXT model.

Ok so lets say it does weigh 3,189 lbs like originally stated, how could an extra 75 lbs over the MS3 make that much of a difference? I dont see the weight playing a factor here when comparing it to a MS3.

Why don't you wait till the car comes out to say you handle better then them? Senior SRT manager already said it pulls .90 lateral G's.

Agreed but there are things you can do to help minimize the eye sores. A simple change of wheels with beefier tires can help fill those fender flares better. Maybe coat the tails with nightshades? But you at least gotta give SRT credit for making something that looked like garbage look at...

I'll agree the car is not that great looking, but aftermarket can take care of that as well.

Actually the senior manager for SRT, Herb Helbig, said that. Just relaying the message since this thread is about the SRT-4 and people tend to think the handling will blow.

I believe the new SRT-4 will pull around .90 in the lateral G's

I dunno why the weight says 2,966 unless it got lighter?

some new info on the SRT... http://www.drivesrt.com/en/dodge_caliber/pdf/tech_specs_teamplate_calibersrt4.pdf

Keep in mind the ms3 has higher compression pistons and more boost stock. I do believe the SRT has two cats as well.