Search results

Thanks. I want to see the Mitsubishi Outlander (RAV4 Slayer in Japan) and Ford Edge (CX7's Cousin) tested too (RTM)

Unreadable - Too small. Scan it again (poke)

Which model had the Bridgestone tires on them?(poke)

Yeah nothing like words as a clue (RTM)

Well even if they are average tires, going from average tires to bad tires is still a rip-off cost cutting move on Mazda's part. Also one of the CX7 reviews (I forget which one) specifically mentions the Eagles performed well on the CX-7.

Stop Mazda!!! Write Mazda, Motortrend, Edmunds, Autoweek, etc, so they can exposed/stop this dirty trick!!! CX-7 reviews are not representative of production car performance with this underhanded tire swap. They should print this so Mazda will be embrassed and lose sales for this dirty cost...

Yeah that was a piss poor quality hint...

Yeah thats very unhanded of Mazda. All the reviewers had CX7 with Eagle RS-A M+S. One of the reviews specifically mentions they were good tires, so the performance will be less with these sh*te tires. This is a dirty deal for possible CX-7 owners:bs:

Or you just used google (which is one point of this contest) ;)

I doubt it. A lot of people say that in forums about their car but don't actually calculate via compiling their fill-up receipts. The EPA stickers are wrong on a majority of cars and are being revised downward for 2008 MY...

Its also been scientifically studied that its more ecologically responsible to buy used and keep repairing than to upgrade to a new cleaner/more efficient vehicle since 20-40% of resources a vehicle consumes in its lifetime occur before you even take ownership of the new vehicle.

Yes CPO is a much more financially viable option than 87 vs. 91 octane using brand new cars. A new car is a terrible investment if you want to save money.

:bs: Thats about $1.23 a day, the price of can of small can of soda from a vending machine or a snack from a convenience store. Elminate some junk food from your diet and you'll be healthier with a better, safer (more standard safety equipment and better handling and braking to avoid...

The Car Connection http://www.thecarconnection.com/Vehicle_Reviews/SUVs_Wagons/2007_Mazda_CX-7.S181.A10361.html

Check vehicle reviews on www.consumerguide.com - vehicles never get their EPA sticker and thats why for 2008 MY they will be revised downwards. If you look at various reviews of the new RAV4 V6, they are only getting between 16-19 mpg, so their EPA sticker of 21/28 doesn't mean jack in the real...

According to Edmunds.com, the true cost to own (financing, fuel costs, maintenance, depreciation, repair, taxes&fees, and insurance) for a mid-upper 27K variant of either works out to $.53/mi for the regular 87 using RAV4 V6 CUV and $.56/mi for the premium 91 using CX-7 4cyl turbo DI CUV. It...

How is the red color? I'd have to see the colors in person, but I think I want either silver, platinum, or copper red.

FYI, you can now get a 2" receiver hitch for the CX7. The same class II weight limitations still apply - this is mainly for bike racks or other light accessories that work better with 2" hitches. Class II 2" hitch available

Well in the US wagons are not popular, so you can't get something similarly innovative (the old mazda 6 wagon is not as attractive) and they usually have less space. CUVs offer more ground clearance than regular cars, but no multimode 4WD, low-range, locking hubs, etc. CUVs get much better...

Yeah I actually got the idea from seeing the install at the rav4world.com forum on a 06 RAV4. Having a tough call between the V6 RAV4 and CX-7. For CX7 - handling, braking, styling, features, ergonomics For RAV4 - acceleration, price, mpg, uses 87, resale, cargo space Also not sure if the AWD...