Search results

yeah its a pretty solid mix of city & highway. i wouldnt go much more than 50/50, possibly 60/40 - lean towards city depending on the week. its about what its rated at for that mix so its definitely fine, just would be nice for the dash and my calcs to match up closer i guess

ive had my 2018 CX-5 for about 2-2.5 weeks now and have about 700 miles on it, went through the gas the dealer put it and then decided to use Fuelly to track my fill ups for a while. My first tank i tracked Fuelly said 23.2MPG while my dash said 26.2. that's a pretty significant difference in...

id say its just that. demand for AWD is probably significantly less in locations like CA, esp compared to New England. Hell, most of the dealers around me (IL) only had about 2-3 FWD compared to 10's of AWDs

ended up getting an excellent offer on a Crystal Blue GT AWD with Premium Package for $30,591 + TTL and that price qualified for Mazdas .9% financing for 60 month. i took the offer without even trying to negotiate as it seems they basically threw in the premium package and dropped around $100...

yeah its kinda crazy. i was offered a 2017 GT AWD with the premium package for 32452 or a 2018 GT AWFD no package for 30692. i really just want the package for the memory drivers seat and power passenger seat both of which are standard on the 2018. not to mention the 2018 package is 1400 which...

is that cost taking incentives into the equation? I have an offer for a 2017 GT no package of 33,324 OTD, which is about ~$30,773 for the car alone and i am thinking they can do better esp without the package which i have now decided i want. trying to decide what i should be countering with