Search results

  1. D

    2017 Mazda CX-5 wins IIHS 2017 Top Safety Pick + Award!

    So, the test results are in and the new CX-5 turned in an excellent performance! http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/mazda/cx-5-4-door-suv%20/2017 One of the measures that is especially noteworthy is the headlight performance! The CX-5 excelled, and you can get that level of performance...
  2. D

    Test Drove a 2017 GT FWD this afternoon!

    This afternoon, I took some time out and test drove a '17 CX-5 GT FWD at my closest dealer in Fort Worth. I'm going to be doing some comparisons with my current car (a 2016 CX-5 GT FWD) and a 2017 Honda CR-V EX AWD that I drove earlier this year. Here are some observations: 1) Even with me...
  3. D

    C&D: Best Crossovers and SUVs: Mazda: 2; Honda and Kia: 0!

    Check out the Nov '16 issue of Car and Driver for why they love the '16 CX-5 and CX-9! I understand their love!
  4. D

    Strange HD Traffic Image

    Hi All, I've been having some issues with HD traffic lately, but this is a new one. Notice the weird red overlay on the total traffic network logo. Does anyone know what this is? If yes, I'd appreciate finding out. Thanks!
  5. D

    I just leased a 2016 CX-5 GT

    I took delivery of a 2016 GT FWD with Tech Package in Meteor Gray! Is the car perfect? No. Is it pretty darn excellent? Yes!! Do I understand why so many professional car scribes who have actually driven the CX-5 rave about it? Yes!! And, by the way, here's an admittedly subjective point. After...
  6. D

    What do you LIKE about the 2016 CX-5?

    My purpose in starting this thread is two-fold. The first reason is to provide a more-balanced look at the 2016. The second purpose is to call attention to new, helpful features, "Easter eggs," etc. for new or potential owners.
  7. D

    Come on, Mazda! Update the 2016 website!

    It's good that Mazda has so many 2016s in inventory. Now, it's long overdue for them to give potential US customers the options of building their own, downloading brochures, etc. IMO, they should have updated the website no later than March 1 and, yet, here we are over three weeks later! Come...
Back