I recall the 90:10 ratio as well but can't find it now. The AWD was revised for 2016. But you would think going 100:0 would afford the vehicle better fuel economy but the 2015 and 2016 AWD versions have the same highway rating.
The torque split is 100:0 front rear, and up to 50:50 during slippage. The 50:50 split is temporary and the system is not built to hold that for long.
https://www.mazda.co.nz/innovation/driving-engine-technology/active-torque-split-ats-all-wheel-drive
Alex on Autos review of the Mazda CX-3. Posting here since people seem to cross shop this with the CX-5.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zshmg5SBOU
for comparison, below is the CX-5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTtoSFehn2E
My guess is the price may be high for two reasons. 1 being the OE tire they can command a higher price and 2 they are playing the supply demand game. No doubt toyo is prioritizing production direct to Mazda than consumers and in order to meet Mazdas demands they need to curb aftermarket demand...
If you find someone who has this information please let us know. It is one of the most closely guarded secrets in the industry...aka no one really knows
I have a snow blower attachment on my riding mower. 48 inches wide and 18 inches tall. I can throw snow about 25-30 feet. Needless to say, I enjoy a good snow fall.
The point of the video wasnt AWD with all seasons vs FWD with all seasons. It was AWD with all seasons vs FWD with snow tires. Consumer reports was trying to point out that AWD isn't as important as snow tires.
Here are a few other videos that highlight this point...
Consumer reports tests cars the way they are typically driven. As they note, less than 15% of AWD vehicle owners in their survey responded to using snow tires. The point of the test was to test the following options, 1)Do I buy an AWD vehicle and use the all season tires year round, or 2)Do I...