Search results

Just did and it said verbatim: Dr. Dre The Chronic track#6..great tune truly ahead of its time...oh wait I think mistyped- that's what dummies due write CodaMan?

So its fixed:)..Mazda dealer and/or where you bought..or get a car with one that actually DOES something(hint the winner, ya know the one in my sig) https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/car-comparison-tests/a29640493/2020-performance-car-of-the-year/

I'd put electrical tape over it and consider it fixed..that's both because of your lack of detail but more so my honest opinion about what it brings to the table

Can't believe he'll be 9 in Dec..favorite shows: Monster Jam and Roadkill so we get along pretty good..burnouts fixed it!

What a win and series..crazy how they yanked Greinke there I thought. New Volbeat, pretty solid if a bit soft..looking forward to catching them again, show I'd bring my kid to fwiw..Slipknot(who they played with this summer) not samuch..next year maybe if they get someone like Nothing More or 3...

36+GTR and I don't get NAV..that's a fail! I almost never use it, I'm sure many would say the same but its still nice that its there type of thing..idk really strange move by Mazda here.

2016.5 its right under his name that you did catch evidently..eh just bustin stones as per a nyers obligation:)..btw black ugg.. I mean its a real nice looking color but its so short lived I don't even bother washing it pretty much...liquid silver was THE color and if it was still on the 16s I...

I got this one guys(guess they don't like NYers wtf!)..Hey man(and neighbor) congrats on the ride! I'm on my 2nd already- 1st was a loaded '14, this time round I opted for an almost loaded(didn't want the lane keep annoyance of the i-activ pkg) 16.5. Obviously I was pretty happy with my 14...

6yrs 100k on my 14 oe battery 0 issues slept outside but expectancy is more high heat related than cold.

?Nope, nor could you buy a 17my with a manual transmission, and wtf is the "luxury model" and why tf do I need to get the top end luxury model to get the 2.5l motor..not the case since it rolled out in the 14s, 2l no longer available since 2017s...He's dipshit, and a tool. He doesn't even know...

-Scotty's a tool- save for his name --The car he's liking on..that there's a gen1 Mazda CX-5! Hahaha(first)

So 15k miles is the 'your qualified' number to predict how the next 285k should fare?..ridiculousness. If rock solid reliability is your number 1 you may be better served elsewhere(Toyota probably) but if your set on the cx-5, I'd go cpo 2016gt(because its better and the wheels are 10x nicer:))...

FWIW I thought my early G1 handled a bit snappier, flatter than my 16.5..again weight and no additional wheel/tire- upside is a bit more planted and def quieter on highway.

Gen1 has better(sportier): steering/handling- latter of which I believe is primarily if not entirely due to added weight yep goin all MikeM.. and SEATS! Not dissing anyone's G2 or GTR/Sig as the G1 NA is slow but to me the turbos at least should gain an extra dose of sport(at least a bit more...

Not to poop on anyone's parade but I just had a 19 loaner for ~200m..not the turboroney but power, while not ample really wasn't my issue in this thing. They straight up ruined the seats that were really good, steering same its kinda like they girlified it..and hey I like me some girls but ah...

Just took my 16 in for its first service, got a loaded non-turbo 19 CX-5 loaner and I'm 99.9% sure that won't be my next car and a turbo doesn't address my main issues with it which are the seats and the steering. In pics the 30s seats look more aggressive so quite hopeful there and the fact...

Just replaced my '14 cx-5gt with almost the exact same thing just newer low mi cpo in black bc they killed off my fav liquid silver:( So one could safely assume I wanted more of the same..but I kinda wanted something a bit (not CX-3 or Kona small) but smaller, lighter and a bit more agile but...

C&D got 34 in their highway testing vs 30 in the same test w/the sig turbo- latter of which surprised me more. Not saying that's great or even nearly good enough, but it is better. Depending where you live with current gas/diesel spreads and if you do mostly open highway it still could make...

^They cost more than they're worth probably about 90-95% of the time..don't have the numbers but I'd be shocked if it were far less than that. They offer piece of mind I guess but at a pretty hefty cost. That- on a pretty dang reliable vehicle (that is quite relevant to the cost is it not??)...

^I was about to say why the hell would the Camry's lack of headroom have anything to do w/that of the Rav4..holy crap 37.5 Camry/37.7 Rav4(with sunroof)/39.3 for CX-5 w/sunroof...wow. Didn't really cross shop it- went right back to gen1 CX-5 after pricing up a RAV online w/the crap I'd...