Search results

So, the test results are in and the new CX-5 turned in an excellent performance! http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/mazda/cx-5-4-door-suv%20/2017 One of the measures that is especially noteworthy is the headlight performance! The CX-5 excelled, and you can get that level of performance...

So, how do I go about ignoring MANGO CON MIERDA?

Yrwei(Ray): Expose reporter extraordinaire!

Is the CX-9's color deep crystal blue? If so, I like it!

Someone just made it far more ugly with all the F&F crap.

Just cling to whatever "facts" help you sleep at night, Mango!

Pressure for all makes to improve is a good thing. However, here's my take on the CR-V vs. CX-5 debate (I've driven both): The Honda brings to the table some nice things (so does Mazda (e.g., the HUD and a power passenger seat that's height adjustable)). But, those things came with a price...

This guy Mango again? He makes statements that show he doesn't know jack sh#t about logically defensible statements. I'm not even going to go into the statistical confounds of self-report bias, small ns, etc. Next...

Useless read; the story of this class action suit is old news.

Except that you forget about the mirror mounted turn signals that all 2017 CX-5s have. This feature does a great job of mitigating this issue, while allowing the CX-5 to have cool central turn signals.

"Heated steering wheel and rear seats as well as windshield wiper de-icer are rarely used by a half of the US customers. MADD/HUD is unique and expensive, but most US customers have never used this feature and they don't feel the need of wanting one!" Yrwei: What sampling technique did you use...

Thanks for the review! Did you drive front wheel drive, all wheel drive, or both drivetrains?

I saw this for the first time too on Monday, on the way back from dropping someone back at Love Field. Interesting...

Yeah, some folks make the assumption that the eternal blue us almost identical to reflex blue. It's darker, has more depth, and really pops in the sun!

Kellic: I don't think you've been asked this before. Is your CX-5 AWD or FWD? What do you think of its responsiveness? Thanks!

That would be the 2017 Mazda CX-5.

Okay, troll! I'll bite this morning, but only because you asked so nicely. See my responses in bold. You can buy a heating steering wheel as an option. I think its $300. Fact check: Try $433 + plus an activation switch + installation. What about rear heated seats? You can't get one at any...

Overall, the CX-5 loses none of its handling, deals with the added weight with no problems, adds a lot of refinement, and doesn't feel like it was either rushed to market or fell victim to bean counters. In comparison, the new CR-V feels like a rushed half-assed product. Sorry Red! Advantage: Mazda!

I found it to be much-improved in the 2017. The boot time, responsiveness to commands, etc., seem much better than those of the 2016 CX-5 and that of the annoyingly-laggy system on the 2017 CR-V.

Gorgeous car! Kellic, since you have a shot of the Mazda Connect screen, I have a question that I wasn't able to check on my test drives. What version of the infotainment firmware is your new CX-5 running? Thanks. I mentioned this in my review that I noticed that responsiveness of the user...