I know. Their line "to create our most powerful, exquisitely designed vehicle ever." makes me hopeful that their PHEV won't be the same as in the CX-60.
There are some "rumored" Mazda 6 pictures (I don't believe them!) that look amazing. Some are the 6 wagon and that care would be amazing with a twin turbo inline 6. But I doubt it would sell!
A comparison between the AWD Mazda 3 Turbo and a FWD Camry. Not a fair comparison in any way shape or form but interesting and fun to watch!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTXBz_GrsDw&t=880s
Yeah, the teaser shots at the 4:28 mark look sharp. Was also surprised to see that the CX-70 is going to be roughly the same size as the current CX-9. I hope they give the rear seat passengers more room and more recline. I use my CX-9 almost exclusively in the 2 row configuration with captains...
Because Mazda and every oil manufacture recommend oil changes of 7500 or 10K miles. All modern cars can and should go 10K miles between oil changes.
The 2021 models burn oil. Why does everyone question that? Mazda has admitted the fact and has a repair in place.
You honestly are just wasting...
The Facebook posts are where you tend to see most of the issues and I can't remember seeing a single thing on CD on a NA engine. Not a single thing. There are lot of posts on the oil burning issue but that we all know about. The whole CD issue was way overblown.
Toyota is going to sell more cars because they have more dealers (greater than 2:1 when compared to Mazda and in many more cities).
My local dealer has 11 CX-50's and over 63 CX-5's listed on their site. But if you go to the dealer, they have 1-2 CX-50's and the rest most likely are in transit...
I have repeatedly mentioned this in posts through this thread but the strange thing is that if you check at any point below 4K miles, everything looks fine. After that, from 4K to 5K, the levels drop dramatically.